Estimated reading time: 7 minutes

DOVER, DE — Delaware’s Senate Executive Committee is scheduled to hear Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 300 on Tuesday, May 13, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in the Senate Chamber. The legislation would create a new state licensing regime for every firearm dealer in Delaware, layering state-level requirements on top of the existing federal Firearms License framework.

The bill is sponsored by Sen. David Sokola, with Rep. Christopher Gorman as additional sponsor and co-sponsorships from Sens. Lockman and Townsend and Reps. Bolden, Griffith, Morrison, and Romer. It was formally introduced on May 8, 2026.

What the Bill Does

SS 1 for SB 300 requires every firearm dealer operating in Delaware to obtain a new state license under a newly created Chapter 9B of Title 24, in addition to whatever federal licensing they already maintain. The bill establishes statutory factors that disqualify a person from holding a license or serving as a “responsible person” for a license holder, sets heightened security requirements at dealer locations, centralizes recordkeeping and reporting, requires background checks for contractors and volunteers with access to firearms, mandates training, and authorizes recurring inspections by the Delaware State Police. It also creates civil penalties and license revocation procedures for violations.

The license fee structure is set at a flat $300 for an initial license and $250 for renewal. Background checks for licensees and responsible persons are required every two years. License renewals are due December 31 of each year. The Delaware State Police is given general investigative authority over Chapter 9B violations, along with the Delaware Department of Justice.

Implementation is phased in beginning July 1, 2028.

What Gun Rights Groups Are Calling It

The NRA Institute for Legislative Action and other Second Amendment organizations have flagged SS 1 for SB 300 as both an FFL killer bill and the infrastructure of a firearms registry, packaged together in a single piece of legislation.

The FFL killer concern is the operating cost issue. The combination of state licensing on top of federal licensing creates duplicate compliance burdens for small dealers, many of whom already operate on tight margins under ATF oversight. The bill’s heightened security requirements, background check obligations for contractors and volunteers, training mandates, recurring DSP inspections, and renewal cycles add real operating costs. For a small home-based FFL or a small sporting goods dealer, those costs can be enough to force exit from the firearm business entirely.

The registry concern is structural. SS 1 for SB 300 requires Delaware firearm dealers to centralize their recordkeeping and reporting through the Delaware State Police. Firearm trace information is required as part of every license renewal application and is provided to the General Assembly through DSP biennial reports. Combined with the licensing infrastructure that knows every dealer, the inspection regime that audits every dealer, and the centralized reporting that pulls trace data on every firearm sold, what emerges is the functional infrastructure of a state-level firearms registry, even though the bill does not use the word “registry.”

A firearms registry is precisely what the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 prohibited at the federal level. Federal law explicitly bars the ATF from establishing any system of registration of firearms, firearm owners, or firearm transactions or dispositions, with the limited exception of firearms specifically regulated under the National Firearms Act. SS 1 for SB 300 builds a state-level system of dealer-mediated recordkeeping that captures most of what a true registry would, by simply routing the data through the state licensing system rather than calling it a registry directly.

The combined effect, gun rights groups argue, is that Delaware would have fewer dealers and a centralized state database of firearm transactions flowing through the dealers who remain. That is the policy outcome a real registry would produce.

The State’s Stated Rationale

The bill’s synopsis cites several pieces of evidence to justify the new framework. The Johns Hopkins University Center for Gun Violence Solutions data showing firearms are used in 78 percent of Delaware homicides. A Journal of Urban Health study finding in-state trafficking was 64 percent lower where strong dealer regulations exist. A 20-year American Journal of Public Health study finding state licensing and inspection requirements were independently associated with lower firearm homicide rates. ATF data showing dealer inspections occur on average only once every nine years.

The synopsis also cites data compiled by Brady United showing 6,626 firearms recovered in Delaware by law enforcement between 2017 and 2021. Half were recovered within three years of retail purchase, which the synopsis describes as indicative of potential trafficking. Sixty-seven percent of the recovered firearms were sourced from in-state Delaware dealers.

The Counterpoint

The cited data leaves out an important consideration. Federal firearms law already prohibits straw purchases, trafficking, illegal possession, and dealer violations. The ATF already inspects dealers, even if the cadence is not as frequent as the agency would like. Layering a parallel state regulatory regime on top of federal law does not address the underlying criminal conduct, which is already illegal. It does, however, add cost and compliance burden to the law-abiding small businesses that make up most of Delaware’s firearms retail sector.

The cited statistic that 67 percent of recovered crime guns were sourced from in-state dealers is also worth examining carefully. That figure measures the original retail point of sale, not the conduct of any individual dealer. A firearm that was lawfully sold in Delaware in 2019, stolen from its owner in 2020, and used in a crime in 2023 still counts as a Delaware dealer source under this measurement. It says little about whether any dealer behaved improperly.

The ATF’s own recently announced 34-rule reform package targets many of the same concerns from a different angle, with proposed rules clarifying the definition of “willfully” for FFL enforcement, modernizing recordkeeping, and removing the previous administration’s zero-tolerance dealer revocation policy that drove many small dealers out of business. Delaware’s bill moves in the opposite direction.

More from USA Carry:

The Constitutional Question

The Second Amendment is a fundamental civil right. The Supreme Court’s decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller, McDonald v. City of Chicago, and New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen have made clear that state and local governments cannot impose firearm regulations that burden the right to keep and bear arms without a historical analogue to founding-era regulation.

State licensing schemes that go beyond federal requirements have not yet been directly tested at the Supreme Court under Bruen. There is no clear founding-era tradition of state-level dealer licensing on top of federal requirements, and the practical effect of pricing small dealers out of business creates a real burden on the underlying right to acquire firearms.

Why This Matters Beyond Delaware

Delaware is a small state, but the legislative model SS 1 for SB 300 establishes is the kind of framework that gets exported. If the bill passes and survives initial legal challenges, expect to see similar legislation introduced in other states with Democratic legislative majorities and supportive governors. The state-licensing-on-top-of-federal-licensing model has been a long-running goal of national gun control organizations, and Delaware would be one of the first states to implement a comprehensive version of it.

How to Participate

Public comment is being accepted both in person and virtually at Tuesday’s hearing. Members of the public planning to provide public comment can sign up using the Senate Executive Committee webinar registration link at legis.delaware.gov. Written comments may be submitted to [email protected] and will be accepted up to 24 hours after the meeting adjourns. All written public comments become part of the official record.

The meeting will be livestreamed at legis.delaware.gov.

Delaware residents who want to weigh in have a narrow window. Once the bill clears committee, it heads to the Senate floor.

I’ll keep an eye on the bill as it moves through the Senate.