HomeLatest NewsArmed Defender’s Dilemma Lesson 4: When Deadly Force Is Justified — The...

Armed Defender’s Dilemma Lesson 4: When Deadly Force Is Justified — The Threat Must Be Imminent and Serious

Published on

Featured

Walmart sales records become critical evidence as FBI investigates Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! TUCSON, Ariz. — A...

Genealogy company exec slams Pima sheriff’s ‘devastating’ move to ship Nancy Guthrie evidence to Florida lab

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! TUCSON, Ariz. — A...

In Lesson 4 of CCW Safe’s 36 Lessons for Armed Defenders series, the focus turns to one of the most critical and misunderstood aspects of self-defense law: the threat must be imminent and serious.

Criminal defense attorney Don West explains the core legal threshold that governs the use of deadly force across the United States. While statutes vary slightly by state, the foundational rule is consistent: a defender must reasonably believe they are facing the imminent threat of death or great bodily harm.

But what does “imminent” really mean in a courtroom?

And how serious does an injury have to be before the law allows deadly force?

That’s where firearms instructor Steve Moses provides what he calls the tactical translation of the law. Legal language is one thing. Making a split-second decision in a chaotic encounter is another. Lesson 4 bridges that gap.

The episode explores:

  • Why “imminent” does not mean “eventually” or “possibly”
  • How ability, opportunity, and intent shape a self-defense claim
  • Why fear alone is not enough
  • How distance, positioning, and disparity of force factor into the analysis
  • Why some controversial self-defense cases end in acquittal—and others end in prison

Through real-world case studies and practical insights, Lesson 4 illustrates how small differences in timing, positioning, and perception can dramatically affect the legal outcome of a defensive shooting.

For responsibly armed citizens, understanding this lesson is essential. The law does not give broad permission to use deadly force. It provides a narrow exception under very specific circumstances. Knowing exactly where that line is—and how prosecutors and juries evaluate it—can mean the difference between freedom and a homicide conviction.

The full video, podcast, and in-depth expert review are now available on the CCW Safe website.

Responsible gun owners don’t just train to shoot—they train to decide. Lesson 4 reinforces that deadly force is never about anger, ego, or property. It is about surviving a truly imminent and serious threat. Understanding that standard before you ever face it is part of living the armed lifestyle.

Read the full article here

Latest articles

New England Firearms Advocacy Conference Scheduled For May 2026

BELLEVUE, WA – The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms...

Desperation: Cost of Living Crisis Forces People To Forego Basic Necessities

The cost of living crisis is becoming desperate for some people. Many are choosing...

The Weight of Reality: Why You Should Dry Fire with Real-Weight Dummy Rounds

There is a fundamental lie in most dry fire training. It’s not malicious, but...

Some states have let unqualified foreign drivers on the road and Americans pay the price

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! Once again, America is...

More like this

Sheriff in Nancy Guthrie case says no glove found at home, defends ongoing work with FBI

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! TUSCON, Ariz. — Pima...

Walmart sales records become critical evidence as FBI investigates Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! TUCSON, Ariz. — A...

Genealogy company exec slams Pima sheriff’s ‘devastating’ move to ship Nancy Guthrie evidence to Florida lab

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! TUCSON, Ariz. — A...